2 comments so far
Kimberly Craven doesn’t speak for me. In fact she speaks against me, as I am in both classes in the cobell settlement. I received money from royalties or leases since I was a child and so I could very well have been ripped off too! I think she is the one pitting us one against the other. And another thing, she says she isn’t holding up the settlement payments but she is even though she may file her complaints on time and early, she is still holding up our payments. I am sick of hearing the newspapers quote her and speak in favor of her. When us 499,999 class members don’t get a chance to speak our piece – That she should stop putting up obstacles to us receiving the payments or the government may decide not to pay us anything! She should have opted out like the others did, rather she would like to grandstand on somethig that she didn’t have any hand in accomplishing. She just may be the one who helped us lose the cobell case.
I am not sure where Kimberly is getting her support, but it’s certainly not from anyone that I have seen or heard from. Right or wrong, the current settlement is the nature in which lawuits are handled, especially for past transgressions. This has lingered on for far too long. The emphatic denial by the appeals court should be an indication of the manner in which it will be handled by the Supreme Court. This has all the indications of Craven and the others being led by their counsel to fill their pockets. I wish that I had the resources to start an effort against these appealing parties. Someone create something that we can rally behind to show Kimberly Craven, Carol Eve Good Bear, Mary Aurelia Johns, and Charles Columbe that we don’t want their interference.
[...] full article here: http://buffalopost.net/?p=16757 [...]