
A Canada Goose covered in some oil walks near the Kalamazoo River in Battle Creek, Mich., on Tuesday. A pungent odor is hanging over the Battle Creek area and the Kalamazoo River valley a day after 840,000 gallons of oil leaked into a creek that feeds into the river. The oil leaked Monday from a 30-inch pipeline that carries about 8 million gallons of oil per day from Griffith, Ind., to Sarnia, Ontario, in Canada (AP Photo/The Battle Creek Enquirer, John Grap)
An oil spill in Michigan that’s sending oil into the Kalamazoo River has raised alarm among aboriginal leaders in Canada.
Those leaders say the 840,000-galllon spill is further evidence that British Columbia should nix a proposed pipeline from the Alberta tar sands to British Columbia, according this Canadian Press report.
Enbridge, based in Calgary, wants to build the pipeline that would end in the coastal community of Kitimat. But as Canadian Press reports:
But Enbridge’s affiliate, Enbridge Energy Partners LP of Houston, is responsible for the Michigan spill and a B.C. First Nations coalition says it’s further proof why the proposed Northern Gateway project should be scrapped.
Coastal First Nations executive director Art Sterritt says despite Enbridge’s claim that the Northern Gateway project will be a model of safety, such a spill could happen in B.C.
Sterritt is recently returned from visiting scene of the disastrous British Petroleum oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
And Coastal First Nations president Gerald Amos tells Canadian Press that such a spill in British Columbia would be devastating to First Nations peoples heavily dependent upon marine resources.
Gwen Florio
Tags: Alberta tar sands, Art Sterritt, BP, British Columbia, British Petroleum, buffalo post, Coatal First Nations, Enbridge, Enbridge Energy Partners LP, First Nations, Gerald Amox, Gulf oil spill, Gwen Florio, Kalamazoo oil spill, Kalamazoo River, Native American news, Northern Gateway



