With this post, Buffalo Post takes a little vacation. We’re not nearly familiar enough with the concept, but we hear it’s really fun, so we’re willing to give it a whirl. We’ll be back and posting again on Monday. Meantime, enjoy our previous posts. It’s been a busy few days. Here’s the AP story on the bison issue:

Gwen Florio

Bookmark and Share

Bilson in Yellowstone National Park (Ruffin Prevost/Billings Gazette)

Bilson in Yellowstone National Park (Ruffin Prevost/Billings Gazette)

MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press

BOZEMAN, Montana โ€” Ted Turner’s bid to get 74 wild bison from Yellowstone National Park is drawing stiff opposition from those who say the animals are being given up for private profit instead of conservation.

Turner has offered to take the animals at the request of Montana’s Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer.

The media mogul would keep the bison five years and then return them to the state. As compensation, Turner would keep 90 percent of the animals’ offspring, meaning he would gain an estimated 190 bison from a herd prized for its genetic purity.

Turner is a longtime champion of bison conservation and owns an estimated 50,000 of the animals across the West. But rising criticism over his latest plan is putting the media mogul in an awkward position. His representatives insist he cannot take the animals without getting something in return.

Some conservationists and federal officials โ€” plus a group representing dozens of Native American tribes โ€” say the animals should not be commercialized.

At a Thursday public hearing over the Turner proposal, they said the bison belong on public or tribal lands. That’s what state and federal officials had promised over the last several years.

“You’re not being true to your commitment not to commercialize these animals,” said Glenn Hockett with the Gallatin Wildlife Association.

The animals are now in disease quarantine just outside Yellowstone. They are part of a 5-year program to divert some park bison from the periodic slaughter the animals face, part of efforts to prevent the spread of the disease brucellosis to cattle.

After prior attempts to relocate quarantined bison failed, state officials had warned they could soon be slaughtered.

Russell Miller with Turner Enterprises said keeping most of their offspring would be necessary to offset the cost of keeping 74 animals for the state for five years.

“We thought there was an emergency,” Miller said after Thursday’s hearing. “We’re not a philanthropy. We’re trying to create a blend between conservation and commercialization.”

Public comment on the proposal ends Jan 12. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Director Joe Maurier will then have the final say on the fate of the quarantined bison.

Some of the Guernsey animals’ offspring could be sold after five years, Ken McDonald with Fish, Wildlife and Parks said. But that commercial prospect has gone largely unnoticed by critics of the bison relocation effort, who have focused their ire on Turner.

The 2006 decision approving the quarantine program stated “the bison will remain wild and noncommercial.” Opponents of the Turner plan have pinned their complaints on those words and similar statements from state and federal officials.

McDonald acknowledged the state could have come up with a better plan for the animals years ago, but said there is now little choice. He said they need to be moved by the end of March to make room for a second round of about 80 quarantined bison.

“I know we can be criticized for, ‘We should have done this 5 years ago,’” McDonald said. “Where we are today is, we’ve got these bison and we’ve got to find somewhere” to put them.

Despite the state’s warnings of slaughter if a new home for the bison is not found soon, a U.S. Department of Agriculture representative, Ryan Clarke, said that slaughter was not imminent. Clarke noted the bison have been in quarantine for years and could remain longer if needed.

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, January 8th, 2010 at 2:13 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

GRAY WOOLF---MOHAWK
 1 

MR.TURNER,
A NOTE TO YOU,THE BISONS AND HAPPY WHERE THEY ARE LEAVE THEM ALONE.THE WHITE MAN KILLED HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF THESE BISONS JUST FOR KICKS IN THE PASS.THEY DON’T NEED BOUGH OFF BY.SOME PEOPLE JUST THINK JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE LOTS OF MONEY YOU, CAN BUY JUST ABOUT ANYTHING.THESE BISONS ARE HONORED BY THE NATIVE AMERICANS.NOT WHITE PEOPLE,I THINK IT TIME OUR PEOPLE PUT A STOP TO THIS.HANDS OFF MR.TURNER!!! THE ARE NOT TOYS.OUR CREATOR PUT THEM HERE TO BE HONORED,AND USED FOR OUR FOOD.AND THE BISON IS A SIMBLE OF NATIVE HONOR.FINE SOMETHING ELSE TO DO WITH YOUR PLAY MONEY.

FROM GRAY WOOLF AND WISE ELDER….
>>>>>>>———————————–>

January 9th, 2010 at 2:29 pm
S Harris
 2 

Why is there so much opposition for Mr. Turners plans to care for these buffalo for 5 years. He has done so much good for the American people by care for these large ranches that could have been subdivided by greedy developers. The Government is willing to subsidize farmers and ranchers to what result. Yet Mr. Turner how takes care of the land he owns, allows access through his property to public lands, leaves it as open space so we may continue to enjoy undeveloped beauty. He ask to be compensated in a way that doesn’t burden the public yet he is criticized. Because of his success. Is envy in among the human races so strong that it keeps a reasonable plan to keep these beautiful animals from being destroyed. So what is the truth?

August 22nd, 2010 at 1:46 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment